<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Erika Napoletano is Redhead Writing &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redheadwriting.com/tag/google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redheadwriting.com</link>
	<description>Unpopular thoughts and blunt advice - delivered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>My Thoughts on the Social Media/Search &#8220;Group Hug&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.redheadwriting.com/social-media-seo-my-thoughts-on-the-social-media-search-group-hug</link>
		<comments>http://www.redheadwriting.com/social-media-seo-my-thoughts-on-the-social-media-search-group-hug#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Napoletano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real-Time Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redheadwriting.com/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who's hugging who in the social media/search "group hug" going on with Google, Bing, Twitter and Facebook?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_739" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-739" title="Creative Commons, toprankonlinemarketing's photo stream" src="http://redheadwriting.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/2758686536_93a672f5d5-300x181.jpg" alt="You wanna hug this word jumble?" width="300" height="181" /><p class="wp-caption-text">You wanna hug this word jumble?</p></div>
<blockquote><p>(As a primer, have a gander at <a title="When Two Worlds Collide: Social Media Marketing &amp; SEO: Hubspot" href="http://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/5231/When-Two-Worlds-Collide-Social-Media-Marketing-SEO.aspx" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/5231/When-Two-Worlds-Collide-Social-Media-Marketing-SEO.aspx?referer=');">HubSpot&#8217;s When Two Worlds Collide: Social Media Marketing &amp; SEO</a> post &#8211; great recap of the Search and Twitter news of the past 24 hours and some excellent graphics as well)</p></blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s talk search. I&#8217;m most always sporting my SEO hat when generating online content. Except on Twitter. I have a feeling that&#8217;s going to change in short order as we witness the <em>interwebz</em> becoming the <strong>interweb</strong>. HubSpot touched on the potential affects the Social Media/Search &#8220;Group Hug&#8221; will have on how content is handled on a move forward basis. Great post and worth 15 minutes of your time to read in-depth (link is above). For the sake of time and attentions spans, I&#8217;m opting for bullet points to lodge my concerns:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><span style="color: #800000;">CRAP OVERLOAD: </span></strong>There&#8217;s a lot of crap on Twitter as it is: spam, affiliates pumping links. Get your shovels now because the term &#8220;crapload&#8221; is about to be redefined.</li>
<li><strong><span style="color: #800000;">SPONSORED TWEETS? FUGGHEDABOUDIT:</span> </strong>With Google and Bing jumping into the real-time search pool, every Tweet is now &#8220;sponsored.&#8221; Linkjuice be damned, the Sponsored Tweet pool has been peed in. Will it matter WHO sends the tweet now if it&#8217;s all about links and keywords?</li>
<li><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>ALGORITHMS:</strong></span> If Google expands its ranking algorithms to include Tweets, holy shit: lock up the women and children. How will they weight Retweets against original posts? Are Retweets the goal? Will gamers set up bogus accounts on an even larger scale to pump up their link juice?</li>
<li><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>URL SHORTENING SERVICES:</strong></span> bye-bye unless you redirect. Ow.ly &#8211; go ahead fix yer shit or get in the breadline now.</li>
<li><strong><span style="color: #800000;">VANITY URL SHORTENING: </span></strong>get yours today. Better yet, hope you got it yesterday.</li>
<li><strong><span style="color: #800000;">SETweet? <span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Keyword stuffing in 140 characters or less. Colloquial conversation just got a stick shoved up its backside.</span></span></span></strong></li>
<li><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>VOLUME:</strong></span> With SEO firms, affiliates, PR peeps and businesses themselves all interested in rankings, will we be inundated with link blasts to drive rankings? How will the algorithms compensate?</li>
<li><strong><span style="color: #800000;">THE BLACK HAT IS BACK: </span></strong>Prepare yourselves. With SEO black hat practices having been re-engineered by affiliate marketers who put up 10 fake blogs to pump links back to a single site, I dare say that we&#8217;re on the verge of a whole new &#8220;think tank&#8221; determining the newest ways to game the system.</li>
</ul>
<p>Some thoughts for the folks over at Google and Bing from a lippy blogger who wears her SEO hat with a rakish tilt:</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>New Algorithm Bling: </strong></span>I know your coders are already pissing their pants when it comes to adding social to search. Think long and hard about how initial postings of Tweets will be weighted against Retweets, please. Each will have its ramifications.</li>
<li><strong><span style="color: #800000;">The Double-Edged Sword that is Volume: </span></strong>Twitter users with large communities enjoy the viral spread of good posts through their network. The power of the Retweet. Will your algorithms penalize, reward or find the delicate balance in popular posts being shared in high volume VERSUS gamers who artificially generate high sharing volumes?</li>
<li><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>Keyword Emphasis:</strong></span> How will you weight Tweets that are keyword optimized? A core component of search, will the new algorithms encourage keyword loading in social posts or find a way to value the colloquial texture of social media as we currently know it?</li>
</ul>
<p>Answers will emerge in time, but Google and Bing aren&#8217;t in the social game. They just acquired access to it. I&#8217;m curious to hear your thoughts on other considerations for the Big Boys of Search to take into account as they grab real-time search by the balls and tell it what&#8217;s what. Leave me a comment below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redheadwriting.com/social-media-seo-my-thoughts-on-the-social-media-search-group-hug/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I&#8217;m Google&#8217;s Bitch</title>
		<link>http://www.redheadwriting.com/why-im-googles-bitch</link>
		<comments>http://www.redheadwriting.com/why-im-googles-bitch#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Napoletano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Spanking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redhead Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seocopywritingredhead.wordpress.com/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's the truth folks: Google beats me and I like it. I also occasionally take some fair swatting  from Yahoo! and MSN, less often from Alta Vista (but their spankings feel super niiiiiiice). Frankly, now that I think of it, I make a living out of spending my 8-to-5 bent over on some desk or another. And it's all for my clients' benefit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_304" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://www.redheadwriting.com/?attachment_id=304"><img class="size-medium wp-image-304" title="istock_000006897818xsmall" src="http://redheadwriting.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/istock_000006897818xsmall2-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Yes, Google! May I have another!?</p></div>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
<strong> </strong><br />
<strong></strong><br />
Here&#8217;s the truth folks: Google beats me and I like it. I also occasionally take some fair swatting  from Yahoo! and MSN, less often from Alta Vista (but their spankings feel <em>super niiiiiiice</em>). Frankly, now that I think of it, I make a living out of spending my 8-to-5 bent over on some desk or another. And it&#8217;s all for my clients&#8217; benefit.</p>
<p>Much akin to being in an abusive relationship, I&#8217;ve engaged with the hot quarterback from high school in a small rural town. His dad owns a farm, his cousins are known for their cow-tipping antics. Did I mention his dad owns a farm? Well, it&#8217;s not just a farm. It&#8217;s the biggest farm in the county. He also owns the land where the co-op grain silo stands. And the trucking company that hauls the grain from each of the farms to the silo each harvest. I think dad also owns the police department. Huh. Quite frankly, his dad owns everything. (I&#8217;m not even going to mention how creepy it is that Hot Quarterback calls him &#8220;Daddy.&#8221;)</p>
<p>So, I decided to make a life with Mr. Hot Quarterback and become Mrs. Hot Quarterback. I love him, see. He makes me swoon whenever he plants one of those burly kisses on my cheek and smacks me playfully on the ass while I&#8217;m cookin&#8217; up somethin&#8217; in the kitchen. I went to work for his daddy&#8217;s (ugh) company as a little computer gal so I could help out the family-n-all.</p>
<p><em>(read: Erika opted for a career as an SEO copywriter because she loves the challenge and constant problem solving involved with her day-to-day routine.)</em></p>
<p>Google smacks me on the ass <strong>a lot</strong>.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re an SEO professional out there, it&#8217;s pretty likely that you&#8217;re getting smacked just as frequently as I am. Only difference is that I might look better bent over a desk than you do.</p>
<p>For the sake of my clients, I&#8217;m constantly embroiled in the ongoing discussion of the &#8220;Google algorithms&#8221; and how search engines determine your page ranking. Why does some piece of shit website with an ungodly amount of content beyond distillation rank a bloody 6 and an easy-to-navigate, user-friendly, well-traveled site earn a paltry 3? For fuck sake, Google. Help me out.</p>
<p><strong>You told me to build backlinks.</strong> I complied.</p>
<p><strong>You told me content was king.</strong> I wrote.</p>
<p><strong>You told me you like keyword-rich anchor text.</strong> I stapled that shit down with some <em>bomber</em> keywords.</p>
<p><strong>You told me blogs were good.</strong> I am a serious blogging mo-fo.</p>
<p>Like the wife of Mr. Hot Quarterback who&#8217;s daddy owns everything in town, I feel some days that I get smacked too much.  Google told me what my chores were &#8211; and I did them! Google keeps me on a short leash, issuing the almighty smack-down for black-hat practices and serious search engine nastiness. For the love of all that&#8217;s clickable, there are only so many blessed directories that you can list a site on.</p>
<p>But you keep changing the game, Google.</p>
<p><strong>Your algorithms are like Mr. Hot Quarterback&#8217;s daddy &#8211; you own everything in town so I can&#8217;t go to the </strong><em><strong>po</strong><strong>-lice</strong></em><strong>.</strong></p>
<p><strong>If I cross the county line into Yahoo!ville or </strong><strong>MSNville</strong><strong>, I&#8217;m going to get less traffic than your behemoth community can send me.<br />
</strong></p>
<p>So I spend my days explaining to my friends at the beauty parlor why we had that argument at the Cracker Barrel on Sunday. *sigh*</p>
<p>But y&#8217;know? I love him. That hot quarterback of mine who&#8217;s put on 50 lbs. since we got married (he says it&#8217;s muscle)&#8230;he&#8217;s the love of my life. He&#8217;s introduced me to everyone wonderful in this little/big town we live in and I meet someone new every day. When he smacks me on the ass in the kitchen, I can&#8217;t help it but to giggle and blush a little bit.</p>
<p>Google &#8211; you can smack me anytime. I&#8217;m completely <em>your bitch</em>. All I ask is that, if I play by the rules and I play well, allow me a victory every now and then. And admittedly &#8211; you have. But as an SEO professional, I can&#8217;t really take my clients anywhere else (and you know that). I want them to be safe in your hands. So instead of giving me a smack-down when you change your algorithms, why don&#8217;t you put on that unassuming little polo rig like the guy in the picture above? I&#8217;ll put on some fishnets. Some pearls. We&#8217;ll have a party &#8211;  big, wicked search engine party and I&#8217;ll get excited when you double-click my mouse. Go ahead &#8211; put &#8220;naughty&#8221; in the search box. We&#8217;ll see what pops up in the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redheadwriting.com/why-im-googles-bitch/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

