http://www.redheadwriting.com/write-on-the-redhead-speaks-elsewhere-on-prop-8 Unpopular thoughts and blunt advice - delivered Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:48:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.redheadwriting.com/write-on-the-redhead-speaks-elsewhere-on-prop-8/comment-page-1#comment-3645 The Redhead Sat, 23 Jan 2010 09:43:52 +0000 http://redheadwriting.com/?p=934#comment-3645 We already have that now for heterosexuals. People marry all the time for medical benefits. Why not allow legal unions for all? People funnel income through LLCs and S-corps for the tax benefits, so civil partnerships? A step behind the curve. We already have that now for heterosexuals. People marry all the time for medical benefits. Why not allow legal unions for all? People funnel income through LLCs and S-corps for the tax benefits, so civil partnerships? A step behind the curve.

]]> http://www.redheadwriting.com/write-on-the-redhead-speaks-elsewhere-on-prop-8/comment-page-1#comment-2569 The Redhead Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:43:52 +0000 http://redheadwriting.com/?p=934#comment-2569 We already have that now for heterosexuals. People marry all the time for medical benefits. Why not allow legal unions for all? People funnel income through LLCs and S-corps for the tax benefits, so civil partnerships? A step behind the curve. We already have that now for heterosexuals. People marry all the time for medical benefits. Why not allow legal unions for all? People funnel income through LLCs and S-corps for the tax benefits, so civil partnerships? A step behind the curve.

]]> http://www.redheadwriting.com/write-on-the-redhead-speaks-elsewhere-on-prop-8/comment-page-1#comment-2571 The Redhead Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:43:52 +0000 http://redheadwriting.com/?p=934#comment-2571 We already have that now for heterosexuals. People marry all the time for medical benefits. Why not allow legal unions for all? People funnel income through LLCs and S-corps for the tax benefits, so civil partnerships? A step behind the curve. We already have that now for heterosexuals. People marry all the time for medical benefits. Why not allow legal unions for all? People funnel income through LLCs and S-corps for the tax benefits, so civil partnerships? A step behind the curve.

]]> http://www.redheadwriting.com/write-on-the-redhead-speaks-elsewhere-on-prop-8/comment-page-1#comment-3284 The Redhead Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:43:52 +0000 http://redheadwriting.com/?p=934#comment-3284 We already have that now for heterosexuals. People marry all the time for medical benefits. Why not allow legal unions for all? People funnel income through LLCs and S-corps for the tax benefits, so civil partnerships? A step behind the curve. We already have that now for heterosexuals. People marry all the time for medical benefits. Why not allow legal unions for all? People funnel income through LLCs and S-corps for the tax benefits, so civil partnerships? A step behind the curve.

]]> http://www.redheadwriting.com/write-on-the-redhead-speaks-elsewhere-on-prop-8/comment-page-1#comment-2568 mobilene Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:46:26 +0000 http://redheadwriting.com/?p=934#comment-2568 What would happen if the government got out of the marriage business and, instead, got into the civil-partnership business, allowing any two people to form such a union? What would happen if the government got out of the marriage business and, instead, got into the civil-partnership business, allowing any two people to form such a union?

]]> http://www.redheadwriting.com/write-on-the-redhead-speaks-elsewhere-on-prop-8/comment-page-1#comment-2570 jim Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:46:26 +0000 http://redheadwriting.com/?p=934#comment-2570 What would happen if the government got out of the marriage business and, instead, got into the civil-partnership business, allowing any two people to form such a union? What would happen if the government got out of the marriage business and, instead, got into the civil-partnership business, allowing any two people to form such a union?

]]> http://www.redheadwriting.com/write-on-the-redhead-speaks-elsewhere-on-prop-8/comment-page-1#comment-3283 jim Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:46:26 +0000 http://redheadwriting.com/?p=934#comment-3283 What would happen if the government got out of the marriage business and, instead, got into the civil-partnership business, allowing any two people to form such a union? What would happen if the government got out of the marriage business and, instead, got into the civil-partnership business, allowing any two people to form such a union?

]]> http://www.redheadwriting.com/write-on-the-redhead-speaks-elsewhere-on-prop-8/comment-page-1#comment-2567 Tweets that mention Write On: The Redhead Speaks Elsewhere on Prop 8 | RedheadWriting -- Topsy.com Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:37:50 +0000 http://redheadwriting.com/?p=934#comment-2567 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shaun McLane and JobShoots, JobShoots. JobShoots said: Write On: The Redhead Speaks Elsewhere on Prop 8 http://bit.ly/5YrTg9 #news #socialmedia [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shaun McLane and JobShoots, JobShoots. JobShoots said: Write On: The Redhead Speaks Elsewhere on Prop 8 http://bit.ly/5YrTg9 #news #socialmedia [...]

]]>